Geobulletin alpha

News from the Geoblogosphere feed

by Stratigraphy.net
New from Snet: Lithologs, a new tool to create lithological/sedimentological logs online..

Serving Two Masters: Science and Profession

Source info:

Author: Philip Allen
Date: 2014-07-07 10:48:00
Blog: earth-literally
URL: http://earth-literally.blogspot.com/2014/07/serving-two-masters-science-and.html

Summary:

It was with slight embarrassment that I read of the Geological Society of London’s successful drive to increase take-up of chartership and accreditation among its Fellows (Geoscientist, 23/11, p.7). It is unambiguously a good thing, in my view, for practitioners of geoscience to be certified according to rigorous professional standards. Then why have I, along with many others in the academic community, resisted applying for chartership despite having spent 40 years since graduation employed as a geologist and almost as long as a Fellow, and having served on Council and acted as Science Secretary? It’s not that I am too lazy, or haven’t the time.This sense of embarrassment got me thinking about what science actually is. The body of scientists is a community based on shared principles, and the dazzling success of science has been in large part because this community has held together over the centuries through adherence to ideas about freedom and scholarship, through being persuaded by nothing other than the discovery of what might be called ‘fact’. The sort of community that is needed to ensure the achievement of this virtuous goal is one of independence, so that we are not swayed by motives outside of the search for truth, and a mark of this independence is the value given to originality. Scientists therefore dissent rather than club together, since this is a signal of freedom to think independently rather than being browbeaten by dogma. True, scientists do not always live up to these ideals of scholarship and behaviour, but when they fail, it is generally recognized as bad and involves reputational damage. It is because of this very nature of science that I find it difficult to align myself with the solemn codes of conduct of professional organizations. Such organizations rightly guide their members in what is recognized as good practice, protect their members from accusation from outside, provide models of behaviour and a college of like-minded professionals and I dare say friends. But unlike in the community of science, these codes do not spring from the work being regulated – they are imposed externally by the expectations of society at large.The trickster and ever-hungry Truffaldino from Carlo Goldoni's comedy.The academic scientist and the professional are members of different social worlds, and it is difficult to be the servant of two masters. Playwright Carlo Goldoni’s 1753 comedy Il servitore di due padroni (Servant of Two Masters) involves a servant, Truffaldino, who is permanently hungry and who, in the centerpiece of the play, desperately tries to serve a banquet to two different masters while attempting to satisfy his own hunger. It turns out, inevitably, that Truffaldino is hungry for love rather than for food. Nevertheless, the stressful gymnastics involved in accommodating the requirements of two masters is enough to make the servant stutter.Ideally, scientists do not need to be reminded to behave themselves since they have an unwritten contract to do so with other members of the community of science. They do not need the geological version of an Hippocratic Oath. After 40 years of independence, originality and dissent, I find it difficult to exchange one social world for another. I can’t perform the manic gymnastics of Truffaldino, even if the reward is two salaries and a double portion of food.The Geological Society has on its logo ‘serving science and profession’. I now appreciate that this phrase means exactly what it says - not a merger of science and profession, but two linked social worlds serving society. The problem is that knowing this doesn’t quite extinguish my sense of embarrassment.This blog is a modified version of an Opinion piece entitled ‘Science and profession’ published in the July 2014 Geoscientist, http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/Geoscientist/July-2014.

Content analysis:

Keywords:

academic community, accusation, adherence, behaviour, Carlo Goldoni, centerpiece, chartership, community, dazzling success, different masters, different social worlds, dissent, double portion, embarrassment.This blog, ever-hungry Truffaldino, Fellows, freedom, Geological Society, geological version, geologist, Geoscientist, good practice, good thing, Hippocratic Oath, Il servitore di, independence, like-minded professionals, logo ‘serving science, London, manic gymnastics, members, Opinion piece, originality, Playwright Carlo Goldoni, professional organizations, reputational damage, rigorous professional standards, scholarship, science, Science Secretary, scientists, sense, servant, slight embarrassment, solemn codes, stressful gymnastics, successful drive, take-up, unwritten contract, virtuous goal

Stratigraphy.net | Impressum
Ads: